|
|
|
|
Media
Silence on the Myth of ‘Safe Sex
’
|
| Even condom advocates caution that condoms are effective only if used in a clinical fashion that might work in a Planned Parenthood lab. Why do you assume that kids, many of whom are impaired at the time by drugs or alcohol, will put on the condom before any emission or arousal, a wildly implausible scenario? |
| Studies show that the portion of the human brain that governs the ability to resist impulse behaviors does not fully develop until people are in their 20s. Why do you think teens will approach sex in a logical, clinical fashion? |
| Schools routinely teach kids not to smoke or abuse drugs, period. They do not teach them how to do it “safely.” Why use that rejected approach when it comes to sex? |
| How much government funding does Planned Parenthood receive annually (answer: more than $300 million) and how much of it goes to this profoundly wrong approach of “safe sex” education?" |
Zogby
Survey Shows Dramatic Shift in Attitudes Once Parents Understand Differences
Between Abstinence and Comprehensive Sex Education
"Atlanta, May 4, 2007
— The National Abstinence Education Association (NAEA) today released a new
survey from Zogby International showing that when parents become aware of what
abstinence education vs. comprehensive sex education actually teaches, support
for abstinence programs jumps from 40% to 60%, while support for comprehensive
programs drops from 50% to 30%. This sharp increase in support of abstinence
education is seen across all political and economic groups."
Numerous
Studies Prove Abstinence Education Works, Mathematica Findings Too Narrow
"ATLANTA, April 16, 2007
— The recent March conference on the Evaluation of Abstinence Education,
sponsored by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), featured at
least 30 significant evaluation studies that demonstrated positive trends in
teen abstinent behavior, says Valerie Huber, Executive Director of the National
Abstinence Education Association (NAEA). The NAEA also recently released a list
of numerous peer-reviewed, published studies that demonstrate that abstinence
education programs are effective in delaying sexual debut, reducing partners
once sexually active, and empowering sexually experienced students to embrace
abstinent behavior. This list is available online at http://www.abstinenceassociation.org/docs/NAEA_Abstinence_Works_041207.pdf
(PDF, ~50KB)"
"Washington, DC (March 21, 2008) — The
National Abstinence Education Association (NAEA) questions the findings of the
University of Washington study claiming that students who receive abstinence
education are at a greater risk for becoming teen parents. The results, set to
be published in the April 2008 edition of the Journal of Adolescent Health,
lack validity because the abstinence and contraceptive-based approaches are not
accurately or clearly defined in the data.
"This study is suspect because it only addresses teen pregnancy, dismissing
rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) or the emotional risks of casual
sex, and there is no accurate comparison of data between abstinence and
contraception-based curriculums. The research is simply data-mining, and both
curriculums are greatly misrepresented," said Valerie Huber, Executive
Director, NAEA. "Teens are at risk for pregnancy, STDs and emotional
consequences when they add sex to their relationships, so it is important that
we look at the growing body of research showing abstinence education as the only
curriculum to successfully address all three important topics."
The January 2008 edition of the American Journal of Health Behavior published a study showing students who receive abstinence education are 50-percent less likely to initiate sex. A 2004 Journal of Adolescent Health article concluded abstinence education has substantially contributed to the decrease in teen pregnancy."
MATHEMATICA
ABSTINENCE STUDY USES FUZZY MATH, POSTED:
APR 16, 2007
"A
much touted report released by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. costing
taxpayers more than six million dollars reported little to no significant
results on students participating in four small programs is being used to
discredit abstinence education programs across the country."
Mathematica
Study Doesn't Add Up to the End of Abstinence
"The four programs that
Mathematica evaluated (beginning in 1999) have already been revised and
improved, and they are by no means representative of abstinence education as a
whole.
Fact:
Abstinence programs dramatically reduce out-of-wedlock childbearing.
"For more than a decade, abstinence organizations such as “True Love Waits”
have encouraged young people to abstain from sexual activity. As part of these
programs, young people are encouraged to make a verbal or written pledge to
abstain from sex until marriage. Young women who take a virginity pledge are
about 40 percent less likely to have a child out-of-wedlock when compared to
similar young women who do not make pledges, according to recently
released data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. These
dramatic findings are valid even when background factors such as socio-economic
status, race, religiosity, and other relevant variables are held constant."
Does
AP Stand for ‘Anti-Abstinence Propaganda?’
"Associated Press slams
abstinence-only education as Congress considers funding.
Before digging further into the bias there are a couple of things – just a
couple – that AP reporter H. Josef Hebert did right.
First, he identifies the author of the study, Douglas Kirby, as a
researcher for ETR Associates, and acknowledges that ETR is a leading developer
and marketer of several of the comprehensive sex education curricula reviewed in
Kirby’s report. Hebert also
acknowledges that several earlier studies reviewed in Kirby’s report were
written by Kirby himself. "
Abstinence-only
education policies and programs: A position paper of the Society for Adolescent
Medicine
Abstinence
from sexual intercourse represents a healthy choice for teenagers, as teenagers
face considerable risk to their reproductive health from unintended pregnancy
and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including infection with the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
More
Evidence of the Effectiveness of Abstinence Education Programs
A new study by Dr. Robert Lerner published in the Institute for Youth
Development’s peer-reviewed journal Adolescent & Family Health bolsters
the case for the effectiveness of abstinence programs in reducing teens’
high-risk behaviors, including sexual activity, smoking, and alcohol and drug
use. The study evaluates the effectiveness of the Best Friends abstinence
education program and finds that students in it are significantly less likely
than their peers to engage in any of these high-risk behaviors.
“Abstinence”
or “Comprehensive” Sex Education? The Institute for Research and Evaluation,
Salt Lake City, Utah, June 8, 2007
We have found that well-designed and well-implemented abstinence education
programs can reduce teen sexual activity by as much as one half for periods of
one to two years.
THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF ABSTINENCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN REDUCING SEXUAL ACTIVITY AMONG
YOUTH
Abstinence education programs for youth have been proven to be effective in
reducing early sexual activity. Abstinence programs also can provide the
foundation for personal responsibility and enduring marital commitment.
Therefore, they are vitally important to efforts aimed at reducing
out-of-wedlock childbearing among young adult women, improving child well-being,
and increasing adult happiness over the long term.
Abstinence
Works!
Studies Validating the Efficacy of Abstinence Education, April 12, 2007
|
High School Programs |
| Middle School Programs |